I don’t believe in Gandalf, why would I believe in Jesus?

Continuing with the series I started here, I offer this…

“Believing Gandalf is a real wizard because he is described in The Lord of the Rings makes just as much sense as believing Jesus is real because he is described in the Bible.”

In one form or another I have seen this since my days of contending for the faith on biblebabble.com, it’s nothing new.

Not the most nonsensical and uniformed thing anyone has ever said, probably, but it is right up there with what Britney Spears once said about Japan – “I’ve never really wanted to go to Japan. Simply because I don’t like eating fish. And I know that’s very popular out there in Africa.” Or, “Jesus never mentioned Tupperware so he wasn’t that special and shouldn’t be taken seriously.”

In all seriousness, this is a false equivalent.

The Bible has had an almost totally unmatched impact on world culture, art, literature, philosophy, music, science, and history, whether you think it’s bs or not. The Bible is an extraordinary work of literature that makes some astonishing claims fiction novels do not.  It records the details of the creation of the universe, the origin of life, the moral law of God, the history of man’s rebellion against God, and the historical details of God’s work of redemption for all who trust in His Son. Moreover, the Bible claims to be God’s revelation to mankind, inspired, and the truth.

Lord of the Rings, on the other hand, is fiction. The author knew it was fiction and it was never meant to be enjoyed as anything but fiction, period.

Comparing the Bible to any work of fiction, regardless of how good or well regarded the work of fiction is, in order to make a serious claim against the reliability of the Bible is patently absurd.  All such claims come from the woefully uniformed and should be ignored.

Advertisements


Categories: Apologetics, Christianity

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

6 replies

  1. JRR Tolkien would call that guy a dumbass.
    The New Testament is a collection of the public preaching and pastoral letters of the early church, along with fragments of church hymns, rituals and cannon law. As such it is a witness to what the 1st century church taught about Jesus. The primary witness to Jesus’ life and work is the church he founded, which is a concrete and historical human community. Now, one might call into question the accuracy of the church’s account, but not that the account is meant to be about a real person.
    It is not the Bible that has had these effects, but the Jewish people, Jesus of Nazareth, and the church he founded.

    Liked by 2 people

  2. Weaksauce is the best word I can think of for that attempt at debunking.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: